'Give Me Justice': Dramatic Scenes In Delhi HC As Swati Maliwal Testifies In Person Against Bibhav Kumar

The Delhi High Court postponed its decision on Bibhav Kumar's bail application, paving the way for an anticipated verdict scheduled for Friday.
Swati Maliwal vs Bibhav Kumar

Bibhav Kumar and Swati Maliwal

In a dramatic courtroom scene Wednesday, Swati Maliwal, the former Chairperson of the Delhi Commission for Women, appeared in person during a hearing regarding the alleged assault on her by Arvind Kejriwal's personal assistant, Bibhav Kumar. Maliwal sought justice, saying that she was brutally assaulted by Kumar, who, she alleged, was shielded by Chief Minister Kejriwal himself.
Maliwal recounted the incident, stating, "Not only was I brutally assaulted by the PA, but I have also endured public shaming and threats to my life and my family's safety." She expressed her plea for justice, emphasizing her role in providing justice to countless women through her work at the Women's Commission.
The Delhi High Court reserved its verdict on the bail application filed by Bibhav Kumar, setting the stage for a decisive judgment expected on Friday. During the proceedings, arguments were presented by both sides, with Kumar's counsel highlighting procedural irregularities and questioning the delay in filing the FIR.
The defense argued that the incident on May 13th, where Swati Maliwal allegedly barged into the Chief Minister's residence without an appointment, was a matter of miscommunication rather than assault. They emphasized Kumar's cooperation with the investigation and challenged the grounds for his prolonged custody.
In response, Delhi Police asserted that Kumar wielded significant influence despite being a dismissed government officer, potentially compromising witnesses and evidence. They underscored concerns about his potential to tamper with the investigation, despite the completion of their inquiries.
The courtroom drama unfolded with intense scrutiny of both legal arguments and the broader implications of the case, which has captured public attention due to its political undertones and allegations of abuse of power.
The hearing concluded with the judiciary reserving its decision, leaving stakeholders and the public awaiting the forthcoming verdict on a case that has stirred controversy and raised questions about governance and accountability in the capital.
End of Article
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news
news